Here are some posts by the muslim YEC joe gallien regarding CSI, etc., on his IDiotic blog:

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/search?q=Joe+Felsenstein-+Clueless+%27til+the+end

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/search?q=++Elizabeth+Liddle-+Still+Clueless+WRT+Science

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/search?q=How+Can+CSI+be+a+Bogus+Concept+When+the+World+Depends+on+It%3F+-

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2014/04/measuring-csi-in-biology-repost.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/search?q=Biological+Information-+What+is+it+and+can+it+be+measured%3F

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/search?q=Measuring+Information-+Revisited

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2009/03/measuring-information-specified.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/search?q=Richie+Hughes+and+the+Lying+EvoTARDs+of+The+Septic+Zone

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/search?q=Measuring+Complex+Specified+Information+with+Respect+to+Biology

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/search?q=An+Invitation+to+Kevin+ReTARD+McCarthy-+Buy+a+Vowel

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/search?q=Science%2C+Quantification+and+Evolutionism

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2010/02/how-to-figure-out-information-content.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2014/03/biological-information-what-is-it-and.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2011/07/cake-time-to-observe-more-evotardgasms.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2010/08/measuring-biological-information-is.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2010/07/measuring-biological-information.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2009/03/destructing-oleg-cakeboy-strikes-back.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/03/joe-felsenstein-proud-to-be-willfully.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/03/no-free-lunch-complex-specified.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/03/elizabeth-liddle-choking-on-csi-and.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/03/joe-felsenstein-quote-mines-dembski-and.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/03/elizabeth-liddle-choking-on-logic.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/03/elizabeth-liddle-joe-felsenstein-and.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/03/why-natural-selection-can-not-put.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2007/09/david-kellogg-english-professor-cannot.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2011/03/of-mathgrrl-csi-and-being-purposely.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/12/kevin-r-mccarthy-still-chocking-on.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/08/joe-felsenstein-still-choking-on-and.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2007/09/biological-specification-dembski-csi.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2011/03/complex-specified-information.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2013/05/why-living-organisms-are-chock-full-and.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2013/04/elizabeth-liddle-still-clueless-wrt.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/08/joe-felsenstein-ignorant-of-science.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2012/07/why-elizabeth-liddle-did-not-create-csi.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2011/04/mathgrrl-still-proud-of-her-csi-willful.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2009/08/csi-and-baseballs-repost-for-blipey.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2008/12/csi-of-baseball.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2014/03/what-prevents-macroevolution.html

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2014/03/intelligent-design-designers-and.html

Have you noticed that...

...abrahamic-god pushers put limits on their allegedly 'omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, omnibenevolent, infinite, perfect' designer-creator-god? They often say that their so-called god can do absolutely anything but then turn around and say things like:

god created only this one universe

god created life, and especially intelligent life, only on this one planet

god didn't and can't create bad or evil things

god can't fix everything that goes wrong or that is bad or evil

god can't get rid of satan

god is perfect but designs and creates imperfect things

god had to "rest" after creating this universe

god can't die

god had to send jesus to try to fix things

god had to flood the entire Earth and kill everything "He" designed-created on Earth except what fit into a wooden boat, and start over again

before recent times, god didn't or couldn't get his 'message' to the people of the Earth who lived somewhere other than certain parts of the middle east

----------------------

Can you think of any other limits that god zombies have put on their allegedly all powerful, all knowledgeable, present everywhere, benevolent everywhere and always, infinite, perfect designer-creator-god?

I would think that god pushers would be the first to claim that their so-called god could, would, and did design and create an infinite number of universes, and infinite number of life forms, an infinite number of human-occupied planets, etc.

Since 'God' is alleged to be infinite, perfect, etc., why are god pushers so anxious to put limits on "Him"?

And what's with the "He" and "Him" crap? Does 'God' have a penis?

Darwin, evolutionary theory, Hitler, and delusional-dishonest god pushers

Are you fed up with god pushers who blame Darwin and evolutionary theory for Hitler's actions? Do you want to show them that Hitler was a god pushing creationist? If so, point them to these articles:

http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitlerchristian.htm

http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler.htm

http://coelsblog.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/nazi-racial-ideology-was-religious-creationist-and-opposed-to-darwinism/

http://coelsblog.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/hitler-despised-atheism-as-much-as-pope-benedict-does/

http://home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/articles/Was%20Hitler%20a%20Darwinian.pdf

What would happen if...

...william lane craig, the pope, Davis Attenborough, and Richard Dawkins were put on a remote, oceanic island under these circumstances:

1. They have no clothes, tools, matches, phones, clocks, or anything else man-made.

2. They have no previous knowledge of the island.

3. There are no other humans on the island.

4. There is just enough shelter, materials to make crude tools, food (animals and plants) on or around the island, and fresh water on the island to survive if someone can find, understand, and properly (scientifically) use the available natural resources.

5. They're put there knowing that no one will check on them for at least 6 months.

Who would be the most fearful? Who would be quickly pleading for help from one or more of the others? Who would get busy on figuring out how to survive? Would religious beliefs and prayer be helpful to survival? Who would be a burden? Who would most likely survive? Who would you turn to for help if you were also stranded on that island?

Now, picture a similar scenario but this time the pope and craig are put on an island and Attenborough and Dawkins are put on a different, but virtually identical island. In other words, neither pair can ask for or get help from the other. Who would most likely survive? And which pair would you rather be stranded with, especially if you don't know much or anything about nature and science? Which pair would you trust with your life?

bizarro, funny, sick, and/or monstrous

http://rr-bb.com/index.php?s=f472d3bfaf938e01174621f1b1d85303


http://www.abovetopsecret.com/Religion_Faith_And_Theology.php


http://www.abovetopsecret.com/Aliens_and_UFOs.php


http://human-stupidity.com/pt/stupid-dogma/religion/sucking-infants-penis-is-legal-in-the-us-if-you-first-cut-off-his-foreskin-without-anesthesia


http://www.subvertednation.net/jews-suck-baby-penises/


http://clergygonewild.com/sex-abuse/34-child-abuse


http://religiouschildabuse.blogspot.com/2011/01/infamous-pedophile-priest-who-was.html


http://www.fstdt.com/Default.aspx

The most vile cult the world has ever known (although islam is in a virtual tie)

http://www.silentlambs.org/popecoveredupabuse.htm



See this page for a lot more:

http://www.silentlambs.org/

joey 'the liar' gallien

Check out the comments here:

http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17489641&postID=6138876921232355144&page=1&token=1338813015413

joey is trying to lie his way out of the picture I found and posted being OF him, and is claiming that it's a picture of someone else, that he took. I submitted some comments at joey's site in the thread linked above but he's probably too much a coward to post them (he blocks most of my comments there) so here is what I submitted:

That picture is OF you and you know it joey. Who do you think you're fooling with your blatant lies?

That picture came from a creationist website and YOU are the one who sent them that picture OF you for your profile there. You have admitted (in several ways) that the picture is OF you. That picture OF you was on that creationist site for a long time, and there is absolutely no believable reason why you would send them a picture of someone else for YOUR profile.

Once I found and posted that picture OF you on my site and on ATBC you had the owner of the creationist site remove it from that site.

You had either forgotten about that picture OF you or you really didn't think that I or anyone else would ever find it. And when I did find it and posted it you knew that you were shit out of luck in ever having it disappear from the internet completely, but you did figure that you had better get it removed from the creationist site and then cook up a pack of lies about how it's a picture you took of someone else. You're slow in the head though joey and it took you awhile to come up with your lying claims that the picture isn't of you, and then only after verifying that it's you in your own words in various ways. It doesn't matter what you say anyway. Everything that comes out of you is a lie.

Hey, tell you what joey, if it's someone else (Ha Ha) then WHO is it exactly? Name, address, and phone number joey.

Hey, I know, you can make up more lies and just claim that the guy in the picture was killed in Iraq so there's no way to contact him. Yeah, that ought to fool, well, er, no one.

You're the biggest fool on the internet and you rank right up there with the biggest fools on Earth. And when it comes to liars you're one of the most inept, but you sure do try hard.

The only thing you're good for is free belly laughs and a target for well earned mockery.

Wouldn't you like to know exactly how I found that picture OF you on that creationist website joey? You'd probably be surprised.

I'm thinking of posting that picture OF you on various sites that are focused on the part of Massachusetts you live in (especially Gardner) and pointing out what a childish, incorrigible, lying blowhard you are, with copious links to your tardacious internet rampages. Where do you think I should start joey? How about the sites for the local schools and newspapers? I'm sure that it would really bolster your ID appreciation day or whatever you call it, and it would really put you in solid with all the decent people in your area.

Oh, and if you are too cowardly to post this it really doesn't matter because I'm going to post it on my site and maybe some other sites anyway.