According to gpukio:
"It is rather obvious that any function, however defined, needs some information to be implemented."
From here (number 8):
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/id-foundations/answering-petrushkas-assertion-and-dr-recs-underlying-claims-are-id-arguments-reducible-to-dubious-analogies-and-after-the-fact-painting-of-targets-where-arrows-happened-to-hit/
---------------------------------------------------------
I'd like to hear what you readers think of his statement.
I'm also going to pose some examples and questions for your consideration:
1. When someone dies of natural causes, is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
2. When someone burps or coughs, is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
3. When rain falls from a cloud onto the ground, is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
4. When two people have sex with each other, is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
5. When a person breathes, is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
6. When a river floods because of heavy rainfall, is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
7. When a volcano erupts, is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
8. When a star forms, is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
9. When an apple falls from a tree, is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
10. When a rock erodes into small particles (e.g. sand), is it a "function" and does it need some information to be implemented?
