Thursday, June 16, 2011

How can such an unintelligent IDiot survive....

....without being spoon-fed Gerber baby food? And isn't it interesting that gildo can call a "typical Darwinist" "a complete ignoramus" and other derogatory terms and UD allows it but UD regularly blocks and bans people who are civil, but just don't necessarily accept ID? So much for UD welcoming civil, honest discussion/debate. So much for 'Christian' values, non-judgment, and brotherly love. The only thing they "welcome" at UD is total agreement with their constant Darwin bashing and blind, unquestioning adherence to their hypocritical religious insanity.

gildo (gil dodgen) is the pompous, religious IDiot who loves to brag about his alleged work in the aerospace industry and obviously thinks of himself as the greatest engineer who ever lived! He also thinks that whatever engineering he has allegedly done is directly comparable to biological entities.

Posts like the one from gildo (below) are one of the reasons I created this blog. IDiots dish it out but won't let anyone respond accordingly on UD. Here, I can say whatever I want, and the IDiots on UD could come here if they only had the balls to leave their protected echo-chamber website called uncommon descent. They won't do that though, because they would have to face comments and challenges that they cannot block or ban.

The cowardice and dishonesty of IDiots are easily apparent. Their imaginary god obviously didn't give them any courage. They're just a bunch of whiny little crybabies, who are hiding, lying, and proselytizing on UD.

Oh, and gildo? You don't have an answer for anything that matters to anyone but delusional, braggadocios, religious morons like you. And the "bizarre disconnect" is between YOU IDIOTS and reality, logic, and any notion of basic scientific reasoning. YOU'RE the ones who live in a fantasy world and base your thoughts and beliefs on silly, ancient fairy tales that have NO scientific merit or foundation whatsoever. When are you going to grow up and face reality?

And by the way gildo, the ToE and abiogenesis are two different areas of study in science. Of course you'd know that if you had a brain and knew anything about science, you fucking dolt.

gildo's arrogant swill:

GilDodgen

06/16/2011

8:31 pm

Light reflects from the glass, enters your eyes, and triggers activity in your visual pathways.

The problem with Darwinists is that they never consider the astronomically complex engineering that would be required to produce such a phenomenon.

This is perfectly understandable, of course, because the typical Darwinist is a complete ignoramus concerning even the most trivial engineering principles.

The Darwinist waves his hands in the air, proclaims that spontaneous generation turned dirt or “the primordial soup” into a highly complex information-processing system in the first living cell, and then asserts that random errors introduced into this highly complex information-processing system turned that cell into Mozart in 10^17 seconds with hopelessly inadequate probabilistic resources.

This is fantasy. Silliness. A bizarre disconnect from reality, logic, and any notion of basic scientific reasoning.

How do these arguably intelligent people live with such nonsensical anti-reason? I know why, because I was once one of them. I’ll give you the answer in a future post.


According to gordy (kairosfocus)

"Science is defined by studying only causes and effects that are natural, and so design is by definition unscientific. It (ID) is also a sneak attack creationism in a cheap lab coat, that is trying to force on us a right wing theocracy with the inquisition all over again just as with Galileo."

How's that for 'quote mining' gordy?

A good read

http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/06/15/biologos-loves-me-this-i-know/


Want to see IDiots making fools of themselves?

Yeah, I know, they do that every time they speak or type but here is an excellent example. And keep in mind the other articles on UD by "News" (o'leary), who accuses 'Darwinists' of making mistaken, uninformed comments about articles or books they allegedly never read. o'leary and the rest of the IDiots on UD are the ones who need to read and understand before they open their big fat foaming dishonest stupid mouths!

Pay special attention to post number 189 by Cooper, which proves beyond any doubt that the IDiots are totally wrong in their asinine interpretation of the paper:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/recent-papers-confirm-that-genetic-entropy-decreases-fitness/#comment-384735


The lunacy of IDiots....

...is demonstrated in the thread linked below. The incalculable arrogance, sanctimony, lack of scruples, blame shifting, and massive outright lying by kairosfocus and all the other IDiots in that thread (and others) on UD are simply beyond comprehension. The IDiots are absolutely crazy and dishonest beyond belief! They KNOW that their agenda is totally religious and political and yet they play every ridiculous game they can conjure up to try to con people into thinking that their concern is purely scientific. How could anyone swallow their blatant lies and deception?

I can't find the words to describe just how much I hate people like the IDiots on UD. They are the lowest of the low, and comparing them to scum would be an insult to scum. They are all the bad things (and much more) that they accuse others of being and their malignant narcissism is literally beyond measure. ALL the IDiots really should be locked away in an asylum and have no access to the outside world. It's scary to think that those IDiots have any influence on other people, and especially children. Any contact with or influence IDiots have on others, and especially children, should be treated as abuse and should be prosecuted as such. The religious insanity of IDiots is dangerous and out of control. Those people are every bit as crazy as muslim terrorists, if not more so.

Here's the thread:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/he-said-it-prof-lewontins-strawman-justification-for-imposing-a-priori-materialist-censorship-on-origins-science/


Monday, June 13, 2011

born to be a complete IDiot

bornagain77 (philip cunningham) continues to destroy any chance that ID will ever be considered scientific by anyone other than insane, brain-dead, pompous religious zealots:

bornagain77

06/12/2011

2:30 pm

Elizabeth, as long as you don’t claim that your referenced computer simulation supports your position, then i have no beef. But if you do claim that it does then I rightly demand that you provide ACTUAL observational evidence to back up your claim. Preferable a violation of the fitness test~!

And:

bornagain77

06/12/2011

3:23 pm

Elizabeth Liddle,

‘I do try to provide support (evidence and/or argument)’

I hate to inform you, but unless you can produce actual observational evidence for neo-Darwinian processes producing a gain in functional complexity/information above that which is already present in life, then all your other ‘supplementary evidence’ is completely meaningless for you have not proved the validity of your primary premise in the first place!!!

And:

bornagain77

06/12/2011

3:27 pm

i.e. all you are doing Elizabeth, with your ‘supplementary evidence’, with no actual foundation in science in which to base your postulations in the first place, is ‘whistling in the dark, trying to placate your ‘chosen’ atheistic philosophy!!!


And:

bornagain77

06/12/2011

3:32 pm

Elizabeth you state:

‘Well, I’m not even sure what you think my “primary premise” is’

Let’s see if I can narrow it down

“However life got here, God did NOT do it!!!”

Is that close enough Elizabeth???


And:

bornagain77

06/12/2011

5:04 pm

Well Elizabeth, you seem to have it all figured out, but to calm my reservations as to your expertise in this matter, perhaps you would care to provide a ‘non-local’ cause for quantum entanglement within DNA, etc.., which does not involve God as to its origination of cause???

------------------------------------------------------------

phil, you are extremely fucked up.

Tell ya what phil, let's see YOUR "ACTUAL observational evidence" that scientifically proves your theistic "position", your theistic "primary premise", your theistic "postulations" and that your god or any god exists, and that your god or any god has or had anything at all to do with anything you claim! Let's see you back up YOUR "chosen" theistic "philosophy" with something other than your BIG FAT MOUTH, bible references, and a million links to wacky religious websites, christian music, christian videos, and other shit that doesn't prove one damn thing about your theistic claims!

And what scientific "expertise" do YOU have, phil-boi? What science have YOU ever done? What are YOUR scientific credentials? What scientific papers or books have YOU ever written and published? What scientific studies have YOU ever participated in? Do you think that pasting a ton of useless links shows YOUR "expertise"? YOU'RE the one whistling in the dark, and making a GIGANTIC fool of your self too! UD and ID will never be taken seriously as long as nutcases like you are allowed to speak for either one.



To see the whole thread where phil-the-god-wannabe continues to be a psychotic jerk, go here:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/fea-and-darwinian-computer-simulations/#comments


Right back at you gordy

gordy mullings (kairosfocus) sure does like to blame all the world's ills on atheists, Marxists, evolutionists, "Darwinists", and anyone else that he doesn't agree with. Below is a recent post from him on UD. My 'corrected' version is below the dashed line.

gordy said:

Confident manner blanket assertions do not a case make.

In addition, it seems that you are indulging in subject switching talking points, that serve to move towards a caricature of theism and theists. (I suggest, onlookers, a glance here as a 101 on the subject. If you spend time listening only to the talking points of those determined to make theism sound like nonsense at any price, you may miss the other side of the story.)

The key issue on the table is the ideologically over-wrought boorishness and abusiveness of PZM as an exemplar of the attitude of the new atheists.

Also, of their habitual uncivil, rudely disrespectful pattern of abuse and slander when they disagree, as can be seen from how he chooses to address it seems Mr Wells. All, because Mr Wells has exposed some icons used in the promotion of evolutionary materialism in the name of science education that have long since passed sell-by date.

It would seem that Mr Myers would be better advised to clean his own house instead of throwing stones.

----------------------------------------------------------
To you, gordy:

Confident manner blanket assertions do not a case make.

In addition, gordo, you are constantly indulging in subject switching dishonest talking points that serve to move toward a caricature of atheism, atheists, evolutionists, evolution, materialism, reality, "Darwinists", the ToE, and science. If anyone spends time listening only to the talking points of those determined (like you) to make all those things sound like nonsense at any price, they will miss the other side of the story.

The key issue on the table is the ideologically over-wrought boorishness, dishonesty, sanctimony, and abusiveness of IDiots like you gordy, as an exemplar of the attitude of willfully arrogant theists.

Your habitually uncivil, rudely disrespectful pattern of abuse and slander when you disagree can be seen from how you choose to address people who don't kiss your pious ass. All because rational people have exposed a lot of lying bullshit used in the promotion of ID/creationism in the name of science education that has long since passed sell-by date.

You and your fellow ID/creationists would be better advised to clean your own house instead of throwing stones.