In this uneducated post:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/on-occasion-the-science-is-actually-settled/
..gil dodgen says (along with other brainless tripe):
"In addition, we have positive evidence that intelligent design would certainly have been required."
Well gildo, let's see your alleged positive evidence!
Is your "positive evidence" just more of the Darwinist/Darwinism bashing you love to do?
