Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Absolutely astounding stupidity and arrogance

My responses are in bold type.

2.2.1.1.3
Joe
December 20, 2011 at 6:01 am

(dmullenix): JoeG, like it or not, ID has already made a whopping big statement about The Designer. You claim that he is Intelligent.

Unlike yourself.

(dmullenix): This necessarily means that He is billions of times more complex (and hence unlikely) than the whole DNA system.

Reference please. Or admit you just made that up. As for “unlikely” THAT ONLY PERTAINS TO YOUR POSITION. Probabilities do not apply to design as it is a given that designers know how to design what it is they are dsigning.

(dmullenix): Meanwhile, I’m waiting for ID to produce any kind of positive evidence for their position.

ID has presented plenty of positive evidence. OTOH your position doesn’t have anything, nothing at all.

(dmullenix): When and where did The Intelligent Designer create the DNA system?

Thank you for proving my point. Ya see in order to determine the when and where we FIRST have to study the design. And THAT is ID-> the detection and study of design.

(dmullenix): You show me your evidence and I’ll show you mine.

Except you don’t have any evidence and you don’t have a testable hypothesis.

All you “have” is somethings happened sometime in the past and these things kept accumulating over vast eons of time and here we are.”

Ya see dmullenix, the way to a design inference is THROUGH your position as required by Newton’s First Rule. And taht means if you had some positive evidence then ID would be a non-starter. Yet here we are.

You lose…


From here:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/upright-biped-replies-to-dr-moran-on-information/comment-page-1/#comment-412471
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Reference please. Or admit you just made that up."

WHAT???????? Did you really say that joe-boi? Tell you what, you shit-for-brains loser, since you're so concerned about a "reference", how about you supplying a "reference" that proves that your MADE UP designer/god actually exists?

"As for “unlikely” THAT ONLY PERTAINS TO YOUR POSITION."

Reference please. Or admit you just made that up.

Dave is correct, and he's being a lot more generous than I would be. I'd say that your imaginary chosen god/designer is impossible.


"Probabilities do not apply to design as it is a given that designers know how to design what it is they are dsigning."

Reference please. Or admit you just made that up.

There isn't a shred of honesty or intelligence in you joe-boi. You IDiots CONSTANTLY rely on arguments about probability to push your "design" bullshit.


"ID has presented plenty of positive evidence. OTOH your position doesn’t have anything, nothing at all."

Reference please. Or admit you just made that up.

You are certainly one of the DUMBEST wastes of oxygen that has ever existed. Of wait, I need a "reference" from you to prove that you do exist. How about it, joe-baby?

And then show the "plenty of positive evidence" that has been "presented" by "ID", with 'references'.


"Ya see in order to determine the when and where we FIRST have to study the design. And THAT is ID-> the detection and study of design."

Reference please. Or admit you just made that up.

Hey joe-boi, when are you IDiots going to get around to studying "the design" and publishing your findings in legitimate peer reviewed journals? And when are you IDiots going to get around to studying 'the designer' and publishing your findings in legitimate peer reviewed journals?

By the way, is there some sort of natural law or command from your imaginary god that says "we FIRST have to study the design" or did you just make that up? You really do like to make shit up, don't you joe-boi? Your entire self is based on made up shit. The only thing real about you is that you're a loud-mouthed, lying, cowardly, two-faced, arrogant turdball that likes to make shit up.

And who the fuck is "we"?


"Except you don’t have any evidence and you don’t have a testable hypothesis."

Reference please. Or admit you just made that up.

Let me guess. You were looking at a mirror when you said that. If you weren't, you should have been. Science, including evolutionary biology, has lots of evidence and testable hypotheses.

ID has NO evidence and NO testable hypothesis, and it isn't science. Hey joe, if you pray real hard maybe you can get your imaginary sky friend to give you some evidence and a testable hypothesis. Try telling your imaginary friend that if it will do that you'll stop molesting goats for a week or two. It's worth a try, unless you just can't go for a week or two without molesting goats. You can always temporarily substitute them with an inflatable party pig.


"Ya see dmullenix, the way to a design inference is THROUGH your position as required by Newton’s First Rule. And taht means if you had some positive evidence then ID would be a non-starter. Yet here we are."

Reference please. Or admit you just made that up.

Newton, schmewton, where the fuck is your positive evidence and testable hypothesis for ID, joe-boi? If YOU had any positive evidence then non-ID would be a non-starter.

This is an interesting and revealing statement joe:

"...the way to a design inference is THROUGH your position..."

It's further proof that you want and expect science to change its inferences to support and conform to your religious beliefs. All that matters to you is that your chosen imaginary god gets credit for whatever it is you want to give it credit for.

Science is NOT going to change any inferences, hypotheses, or theories just to make you IDiots happy, and it is NOT going to do your work for you. Do your own fucking work, find your own testable evidence for ID, and put together your own testable hypothesis for ID, and 'present' it all in a scientifically acceptable manner. Otherwise, just shut the fuck up!


"You lose…"

Reference please. Or admit you just made that up.

Wishful dreaming on your part joe. Your lost "position" has had at least two thousand years to come up with testable evidence and a testable hypothesis for ID (god), yet here we are, with you god zombies still flailing around like spastic fish out of water and still spewing your non-evidential, insane fairy tales.