Wednesday, December 28, 2011

joe-boi...

...says (on his blog):

"So the bottom line is Intelligent Design says “evolved, sure”. The questions are “evolved from what?” and “how did it evolve?”."

Well, joe-baby, with your unsurpassed knowledge of science and evolution (LOL), tell me exactly how every living thing evolved and what every living thing evolved from.

And be sure to live up to your own demands of evidence and proof, and show that your "position" actually meets those demands:

"Science requires POSITIVE evidence, Nick."

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/a-reply-to-professor-moran/comment-page-1/#comment-412947

"ID is stronger than ever and supported by more data."

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/a-reply-to-professor-moran/comment-page-1/#comment-412947

"I bet you can’t even produce a testable hypothesis for that.

Pathetic…"

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/a-reply-to-professor-moran/#comments

"Now you say what I said is not sufficient yet that is all you do- declare it, without evidence.

Your position isn’t supported by anything but imagination. There still isn’t any genetic data which demonstrates a multi-part system can arise via accumulations of random mutations- you can’t even test the claim!

You are so gullible that you really believe your position has the evidence yet when push comes to shove you cannot produce it.

As a matter of fact there isn’t any way to test the claim that random mutations/ random variations can accumulate in such a way as to give rise to the diversity of life starting from some unknown population(s) of prokaryotes.

So where can one find this alleged evidence that you speak of? It ain’t in textbooks and it ain’t in the journals, is it in some top-secret vault?

And MORE spewage- no evidence, just spewage.

Now I understand whty the vast majority of people know your position is a joke.

The evotard substance and evidence-free points are adding up."

http://confessionsofayec.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/genetic-mutation-since-the-flood/

"As I have been saying for decades-> you can only scientifically model what you thoroughly understand.

Kudos for trying but it should be impossible to model the "shit happens and other shit emerges from it", ie materialism, position."

http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2011/12/clean-up-on-aisle-7-real-world-evidence.html

"BTW the fictional scenario is your sorry-ass, evidence-free position. You have no way to account for anything except to imagine it, attack people and drool on your keyboard.

Thanks for the entertainment though."

http://confessionsofayec.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/genetic-mutation-since-the-flood/#comment-435

"So where can one find this alleged evidence that you speak of? It ain’t in textbooks and it ain’t in the journals, is it in some top-secret vault?"

http://confessionsofayec.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/genetic-mutation-since-the-flood/#comment-435

"Kevin misrepresents Creation and gets kudos. Then falls back on the nonsensical claim “My position has hundreds of years of evidence”, yet strange taht it cannot get published."

http://confessionsofayec.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/genetic-mutation-since-the-flood/

"You are so gullible that you really believe your position has the evidence yet when push comes to shove you cannot produce it."

http://confessionsofayec.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/genetic-mutation-since-the-flood/

"There is plenty of evidence that one designer did exist at one time."

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/upright-biped-replies-to-dr-moran-on-information/comment-page-1/#comment-412471

"Any evidence for the accuracy of your claim?"

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/denis-alexanders-strawman-just-as-silly/comment-page-1/#comment-412575

"Bald claims are meaningless to science."

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/upright-biped-replies-to-dr-moran-on-information/comment-page-1/#comment-412405

"ID claims that it occurred by design, ie via genetic algorithms directing mutations to achieve a pre-specified result."

http://confessionsofayec.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/genetic-mutation-since-the-flood/#comments

"Yup and you shouldn’t throw stones as your position has absolutely nothing."

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/atheist-philosopher-reflects-on-new-atheist-jerry-coynes-diatribe-against-philosopher-alvin-plantinga/comment-page-1/#comment-412374

"They are losers because they spew a lot of nonsense and NEVER support the claims of their position."

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/atheist-philosopher-reflects-on-new-atheist-jerry-coynes-diatribe-against-philosopher-alvin-plantinga/comment-page-1/#comment-412374

"Umm that is speculation, not evidence."

http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/tales-from-the-quote-mine-leading-darwinists-believe-with-or-without-evidence-and-why-it-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-408850

"And the evidence says whales had hind fins and the Bible says day 5 of the Creation week (for whales)."

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/fact-checking-wikipedia-on-common-descent-the-evidence-from-biogeographical-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-406888

------------

So, joe-boi, let's see YOU support your ID "position" with "plenty" of scientifically testable stronger than ever "POSITIVE" evidence and data, and a scientific, testable hypothesis/theory, and scientific models of what is thoroughly understood about the actual design process of living things, and make sure that there's plenty of "substance" in all of your claims and that it's all "published". Well, joe?