Sunday, June 12, 2011

Such convincing evidence!

On UD, cannuckianyankee barfed:

As I stated earlier and I repeat here, the purpose of the shroud is not for worship but for evidence in light of current doubt about the resurrection and the historicity of Jesus. That’s how I interpret it.

I agree with you that for we who believe the shroud is not necessary; but it could be necessary in upholding the integrity of scripture when it is doubted.

God seems ås much concerned that people come to belief in him ås He is concerned about graven images. The commånd regårding gråven imåges is for believers. Evidence is for non-believers so they cån believe; which lends credence to John 3: 16-21.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Wow, what a loon. The shroud of turin is evidence in light of current doubt about the resurrection and the historicity of Jesus and could be necessary in upholding the integrity of scripture when it is doubted????

Evidence?? Integrity?? The desperation you religious zombies exhibit is really, really funny. Is there nothing you won't make up to try to bolster your insane claims? The so-called shroud is a joke and it proves NOTHING, except that a sucker for haysoos is born every minute.

Your god, who according to you is concerned that people come to belief in him, must be a real lame, impotent god if the best he can do is a sheet with a fake image on it.

And what's with those little circles over the letter 'a'?

And like paragwinn asked: What does the shroud of turin have to do with ID????