...this?
"And, if such debaters switch to "implausibility," we have a further right to challenge the underlying question-begging assumptions and to expose the associated self-refuting philosophical ideas."
------------------------------------------
Okay, the answer is: kairosfocus (gordon elliott mullings of Montserrat).
Keep his statement in mind when you see him or any other IDiot using arguments that rely on implausibility, plausibility, probability, improbability, likelihood, etc.
That would be most or all of their arguments.
