4
Insectman
October 20, 2011 at 4:35 pm
Dawkins won’t debate Craig for the same reason he would not debate Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo. Dawkins is an intellectual coward. He hurls taunts from columns. That is equivalent to a child acting brave from behind his mommy’s dress tail.
5
kairosfocus
October 20, 2011 at 4:58 pm
Onlookers:
The above — sadly, but tellingly — is a blatant well-poisoning, atmosphere-poisoning distractive fallacy to cover up that Dawkins plainly realises he would be crushed in an open debate with Craig.
6
Blue_Savannah
October 20, 2011 at 5:03 pm
Poor Dawkins…it’s clear he didn’t want to debate Craig because he FEARS him. He knows he can’t refute Craig’s arguments nor can he defend his own. Dawkins is more mouse than lion.
8.1.1.3
junkdnaforlife
October 20, 2011 at 7:33 pm
“Fear or disgust? I see no reason to conclude “fear”.”
So a fighter that refuses to fight when called out does so out of disgust, not fear? A wuss is a wuss. Very simple.
8.1.1.3.2
junkdnaforlife
October 20, 2011 at 8:23 pm
You have your wuss in Dawkins. enjoy.
19
Clive Hayden
October 21, 2011 at 1:01 am
Moral outrage from those who claim no real basis for morality, that believe the whole show is an accident, always tickle me.
I guess Dawkins doesn’t want to debate this topic either with Craig. Let’s be honest, Dawkins is scared to debate Craig, that’s obvious. If Dawkins thinks he has such a blatant moral high ground, why not debate Craig?
And more here:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/dawkins-speaks-why-he-won%E2%80%99t-debate-william-lane-craig-craig-advocates-genocide/#comments
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All that bluff and bluster from FEARFUL CHILDISH WUSSES who "hide behind" their "mommy’s dress tail" in the heavily moderated UD sanctuary and won't argue their position on an open forum.
Hey wusses, I'm calling you out! All of you! Come here and "debate" me! Also, let's see you ALL argue your position, without running away like the scared chickenshits you are, on an open forum where you cannot control the moderation. Come on wusses, show me what you've got!
Also notice all of the excuses for craig and his statement about the slaughter of men, women, and children ordered by his chosen god. And don't forget that those are the people who claim to have the corner on morality. Not even one of them condemns the slaughter of children. For them, since their god ordered it, it's A-OK!
In that thread gordo brings me up again and accuses me (and Elizabeth Liddle and evolutionists/Darwinist/materialists/etc.) of all kinds of amoral, venemous stuff, while HE continues to knowingly, outrageously, and willfully LIE about me threatening his family, and while he continues to FALSELY accuse anyone who doesn't kiss his sanctimonious ass of all kinds of horrible things that HE is actually guilty of. No one could be a bigger hypocrite than gordo, and no one could be a more blatant liar.
He always makes a big stink about his opponents substantiating their opinions or claims. He should actually substantiate his own opinion or claims, starting with his dishonest claims about me threatening his family! Hey gordee-the-LIAR, where YOUR substantiation, you stinking, no good for anything, mentally deranged mass of festering butt juice?
Insectman
October 20, 2011 at 4:35 pm
Dawkins won’t debate Craig for the same reason he would not debate Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo. Dawkins is an intellectual coward. He hurls taunts from columns. That is equivalent to a child acting brave from behind his mommy’s dress tail.
5
kairosfocus
October 20, 2011 at 4:58 pm
Onlookers:
The above — sadly, but tellingly — is a blatant well-poisoning, atmosphere-poisoning distractive fallacy to cover up that Dawkins plainly realises he would be crushed in an open debate with Craig.
6
Blue_Savannah
October 20, 2011 at 5:03 pm
Poor Dawkins…it’s clear he didn’t want to debate Craig because he FEARS him. He knows he can’t refute Craig’s arguments nor can he defend his own. Dawkins is more mouse than lion.
8.1.1.3
junkdnaforlife
October 20, 2011 at 7:33 pm
“Fear or disgust? I see no reason to conclude “fear”.”
So a fighter that refuses to fight when called out does so out of disgust, not fear? A wuss is a wuss. Very simple.
8.1.1.3.2
junkdnaforlife
October 20, 2011 at 8:23 pm
You have your wuss in Dawkins. enjoy.
19
Clive Hayden
October 21, 2011 at 1:01 am
Moral outrage from those who claim no real basis for morality, that believe the whole show is an accident, always tickle me.
I guess Dawkins doesn’t want to debate this topic either with Craig. Let’s be honest, Dawkins is scared to debate Craig, that’s obvious. If Dawkins thinks he has such a blatant moral high ground, why not debate Craig?
And more here:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/dawkins-speaks-why-he-won%E2%80%99t-debate-william-lane-craig-craig-advocates-genocide/#comments
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All that bluff and bluster from FEARFUL CHILDISH WUSSES who "hide behind" their "mommy’s dress tail" in the heavily moderated UD sanctuary and won't argue their position on an open forum.
Hey wusses, I'm calling you out! All of you! Come here and "debate" me! Also, let's see you ALL argue your position, without running away like the scared chickenshits you are, on an open forum where you cannot control the moderation. Come on wusses, show me what you've got!
Also notice all of the excuses for craig and his statement about the slaughter of men, women, and children ordered by his chosen god. And don't forget that those are the people who claim to have the corner on morality. Not even one of them condemns the slaughter of children. For them, since their god ordered it, it's A-OK!
In that thread gordo brings me up again and accuses me (and Elizabeth Liddle and evolutionists/Darwinist/materialists/etc.) of all kinds of amoral, venemous stuff, while HE continues to knowingly, outrageously, and willfully LIE about me threatening his family, and while he continues to FALSELY accuse anyone who doesn't kiss his sanctimonious ass of all kinds of horrible things that HE is actually guilty of. No one could be a bigger hypocrite than gordo, and no one could be a more blatant liar.
He always makes a big stink about his opponents substantiating their opinions or claims. He should actually substantiate his own opinion or claims, starting with his dishonest claims about me threatening his family! Hey gordee-the-LIAR, where YOUR substantiation, you stinking, no good for anything, mentally deranged mass of festering butt juice?
