5.3.1.1.1
bornagain77
September 2, 2011 at 8:47 am
No problem TG. I really wouldn’t call it expertise so much as I would call it holding Darwinists accountable to even a minimal amount of scientific plausibility, which or course, even a minimal level of scientific integrity, is unable to be maintained by them.
From here:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/ann-coulter-on-the-dog-that-ate-darwin%E2%80%99s-fossils/comment-page-1/#comment-398634
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, as if the IDiotic, religious, illiterate tripe you spew has even a minimal amount of scientific plausibility or integrity.
And I really wouldn't call the barf you upchuck "expertise" either, "so much as I would call it" totally insane bullshit.
bornagain77
September 2, 2011 at 8:47 am
No problem TG. I really wouldn’t call it expertise so much as I would call it holding Darwinists accountable to even a minimal amount of scientific plausibility, which or course, even a minimal level of scientific integrity, is unable to be maintained by them.
From here:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/ann-coulter-on-the-dog-that-ate-darwin%E2%80%99s-fossils/comment-page-1/#comment-398634
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, as if the IDiotic, religious, illiterate tripe you spew has even a minimal amount of scientific plausibility or integrity.
And I really wouldn't call the barf you upchuck "expertise" either, "so much as I would call it" totally insane bullshit.
