6
Daniel King
September 24, 2011 at 3:05 pm
ScottAndrews:
Why is it so difficult to understand that intelligence or the lack thereof has nothing to do with mechanisms?
I was just wondering how a postulated “intelligence” might be a scientific explanation for the diversity and history of life on Earth. Without a mechanism, where’s the science?
*
6.1
ScottAndrews
September 24, 2011 at 7:23 pm
Daniel,
That’s a very good question, but it has nothing to do with ID. Read the FAQ and understand what ID is. Pick it apart if you wish to. But in order to do so you must correctly understand it.
Sort of like if someone said, “Evolution is stupid – fish don’t turn into frogs!” Even if one disagrees with something they must understand it in order to coherently argue against it.
From here:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/science-and-freethinking/comment-page-1/#comment-400721
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey scott, NONE of you IDiots understand science, evolution, or the theory of evolution. That (and your belief in religious fairy tales) is why you can't coherently argue against them.
And your evasion of providing a mechanism for ID is noted. You IDiots claim that ID is "scientific". It is NOT scientific in any way, shape, or form. You IDiots don't know squat about how science works.
Daniel King
September 24, 2011 at 3:05 pm
ScottAndrews:
Why is it so difficult to understand that intelligence or the lack thereof has nothing to do with mechanisms?
I was just wondering how a postulated “intelligence” might be a scientific explanation for the diversity and history of life on Earth. Without a mechanism, where’s the science?
*
6.1
ScottAndrews
September 24, 2011 at 7:23 pm
Daniel,
That’s a very good question, but it has nothing to do with ID. Read the FAQ and understand what ID is. Pick it apart if you wish to. But in order to do so you must correctly understand it.
Sort of like if someone said, “Evolution is stupid – fish don’t turn into frogs!” Even if one disagrees with something they must understand it in order to coherently argue against it.
From here:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/science-and-freethinking/comment-page-1/#comment-400721
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey scott, NONE of you IDiots understand science, evolution, or the theory of evolution. That (and your belief in religious fairy tales) is why you can't coherently argue against them.
And your evasion of providing a mechanism for ID is noted. You IDiots claim that ID is "scientific". It is NOT scientific in any way, shape, or form. You IDiots don't know squat about how science works.
