3.1
ScottAndrews
September 10, 2011 at 9:53 am
Aside from her inflammatory statements, she’s about as politically polarized as a person can get. ID is science, not political, but this could confuse a person.
Plus, remember that ridiculous photo of Michelle Bachmann on Newsweek? No one thinks she really looks like that. But I saw Coulter in a TV interview and she really did look like that. It was disturbing. She looked possessed.
(In case my comment raises the question, I’m not aligned with any political party or movement.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
scott, ID is not scientific. It is strictly a religious and political agenda, and a dishonest one at that. The posts and comments by the IDiots on UD alone are more than enough evidence to prove that.
bachmann and coulter are two pee-brains in a pod. They're both psycho, just like the rest of the republican party.
ScottAndrews
September 10, 2011 at 9:53 am
Aside from her inflammatory statements, she’s about as politically polarized as a person can get. ID is science, not political, but this could confuse a person.
Plus, remember that ridiculous photo of Michelle Bachmann on Newsweek? No one thinks she really looks like that. But I saw Coulter in a TV interview and she really did look like that. It was disturbing. She looked possessed.
(In case my comment raises the question, I’m not aligned with any political party or movement.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
scott, ID is not scientific. It is strictly a religious and political agenda, and a dishonest one at that. The posts and comments by the IDiots on UD alone are more than enough evidence to prove that.
bachmann and coulter are two pee-brains in a pod. They're both psycho, just like the rest of the republican party.
