50
Chris Doyle
07/13/2011
12:12 pm
Not just mirrors, Lizzie, smoke and mirrors! At least that is the impression you’re leaving at the moment. How can prejudices be coming from our side when we could EASILY reconcile a rejection of ID and acceptance of evolution in the manner that Biologos does, if we happen to be religious? That’s twice you’ve missed that point now!
And to claim that Dawkins, Hitchens, Myers, Dennett and their followers (ie. Most atheists, not just agnostics which you seem to be referring to) would not be completely devastated by the rejection of evolution and acceptance of ID is frankly laughable! There is no way the atheist worldview – with its lack of meaning, purpose and morality – could ever be reconciled with the demise of naturalism.
That is why atheists cannot go wherever the scientific evidence leads. Only ID proponents can manage that. Join us if you place truth above prejudice, Lizzie.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm constantly amazed at how religious IDiots never see themselves for who they really are. The derogatory things they say about others are exactly the things they are, or are doing. Their prejudices are so deep and so thoroughly saturating their every thought that they believe they are the voice and mind of "God".
It cracks me up that they claim to know what truth and evidence are, while spewing the absolute nonsense of their religious beliefs.
"How can prejudices be coming from our side when we could EASILY reconcile a rejection of ID and acceptance of evolution in the manner that Biologos does, if we happen to be religious?"
chris-boi, a lying nutcase like you could reconcile anything, if it suits your crazy mind and agenda, and I think it's really funny that you admit that your religious beliefs are dependent on scientific discoveries. What's the matter, isn't the bible good enough for you? I thought it's supposed to account for and reveal everything! Did your god leave some things out?
