eric andersen says:
"Shoot, let’s see any kind of meaningful gain in CSI from purely natural processes."
IDiots keep using that totally lame demand, as though it actually means something. It's totally lame because there's no such thing as "CSI". There can't be unless and until "C" (complex), "S" (specified), and "I" (information) are strictly and coherently defined, and it's the responsibility of IDiots to define those terms since they're the ones who rely on them.
"CSI" sounds sciency, but it's not. It's a fraudulent term used by fraudulent people to deceitfully push a religious and political agenda.
"Shoot, let’s see any kind of meaningful gain in CSI from purely natural processes."
IDiots keep using that totally lame demand, as though it actually means something. It's totally lame because there's no such thing as "CSI". There can't be unless and until "C" (complex), "S" (specified), and "I" (information) are strictly and coherently defined, and it's the responsibility of IDiots to define those terms since they're the ones who rely on them.
"CSI" sounds sciency, but it's not. It's a fraudulent term used by fraudulent people to deceitfully push a religious and political agenda.
