Thursday, August 4, 2011

Other side?




3:07 am

Why is darwinian evolution taught at the secondary level is what I meant to say. I wouldn’t have a problem with evo being taught if the other side of the story could be taught too.


What "other side", exactly? Do you really think that whatever "other side" you believe is the "other side", is the only "other side"? How many "other side(s)" should be taught in schools? 5? 10? 100? 1000? More?

lamarck also spewed:




2:50 am

I still don’t understand, what does the Darwin creation story have to do with evolution? What practical purpose does the story have? It’s not used in medicine. Where is it used? It’s got nothing to do with anything and it’s worse than unsupported, it’s refuted, so no reason to teach it.


What does your religious creation story have to do with anything that's worth 2 seconds of consideration? What practical purpose does your story have? It's not used in legitimate medicine. Where is it used, except in furthering delusional fairy tales and in robbing people of their money? It's got nothing to do with anything worthwhile and it's a LOT worse than unsupported. It's refuted, so there's no reason to teach it.

Oh, and there's no such thing as "the Darwin creation story". There is something called evolutionary theory, and it has not been refuted, and never will be by your insane creation story.