Monday, November 28, 2011

Like trying to pull teeth with non-existent pliers

Timbo, like MANY others over the years, tries to get scott andrews, or any IDiot, to come up with a testable hypothesis for ID:

November 27, 2011 at 5:10 pm

An explanation would be nice, let alone a more detailed one.

Science works by making a hypothesis and then modelling that. Can you even come up with a hypothesis that can then be modelled and tested?

November 27, 2011 at 5:11 pm

I pity the frustrated soul who wrote the FAQ that no one reads.


scotty, the FAQ on UD are just more of the usual, dishonest, blustering, bald assertions that you IDiots constantly spew. There's no testable hypothesis in the FAQ and there's no testable hypothesis in anything you lying morons claim about the so-called ID inference/hypothesis/theory. You dullards don't have the slightest clue as to how science should be done.

You godbots can't even agree amongst yourselves on whether ID should be labeled as an inference, an hypothesis, or a theory. At the most it's an inference, but a totally unsupported one, which actually makes it a worthless opinion, based on a variety of interpretations of crazy religious beliefs.

You IDiots can barf your ridiculous religious assertions until the end of time but you'll never get anywhere with science unless you actually do some science and come up with positive scientific evidence and a testable inference, hypothesis, or theory that credibly explains that evidence. Endlessly preaching the same old unsupported, non-scientific, religious bullshit to the choir in the UD echo chamber is NOT science.