Sunday, November 27, 2011

o'leary, the poster twat for brain damage

http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/one-way-skeptic-michael-shermer-sanctifying-tittle-tattle-as-science/

"...the ID community, which is committed to a traditional evidence-based definition of science."

HUH? WHAT EVIDENCE is there for ID, and since when is the "ID community" "committed to a traditional evidence-based definition of science"?

"He and his audience desperately need to believe that it is, and will accept any dogma or speculation that justifies their choices."

Oh man, how could anyone be so blind to their own dogma, speculation, hypocrisy, and projection?

By the way, if ID isn't a religious agenda, why do the IDiots constantly bitch about atheists? Why is atheism such a HUGE concern of theirs? Why does atheism or theism matter at all to them if they're "committed to a traditional evidence-based definition of science"? What do non-evidential, imaginary, fairy tale gods have to do with evidence-based science?