Thursday, November 3, 2011

"civil" discussion

UD says that they "welcome open, honest, civil discussion", but then they allow IDiots like kairosflaccid, barfagain77, uptightbiped, o'scary, and the rest of the IDiots to say whatever uncivil things they want. Here are just a couple of examples:

November 3, 2011 at 4:50 pm

The problem with anyone taking hawking seriously is that most of them do not know is that he used to attend bible study with his ex-wife. From what I read it was only after they seperated (which was his fault because he cheated on her and she still loved him enough to want to be with him after this infidelity) that he seems to drift towards the new atheism remarks.

Its a shame that a person like can use their clout in the scientific community to try to lead people away from the truth

November 3, 2011 at 5:18 pm

Hawkings is a dick, deliberately trying to bullshit the masses. I pity those who are fooled by him.


First, I'd like to see some evidence that Hawking, a person who can't even move, cheated on his wife, and I would also like to know what the fuck it has to do with the original topic of that thread. It's just the usual smear tactics from IDiots who have NO evidence to back up their insane ID claims. It's a blatant, horrible, evil, uncivil, slanderous "BLOOD LIBEL" against the IDiots and their god for Dawkins or anyone else to say anything against wl craig or any other IDiot, but it's perfectly fine for them to say whatever they want against Hawking, Dawkins, and anyone else they disagree with.

And how about that comment from mike? His imaginary god, that his so-called morals are 'grounded' in, must be real proud of him.

If any of you ever wonder why I created and continue this site, the above examples are a clue.