Friday, November 4, 2011

The IDiots keep destroying their own agenda

Single_Malt correctly stated:

November 4, 2011 at 10:00 am

The difference is this.

When you read Richard Dawkins you are engaging Richard Dawkins.

When you read PZ.Myers you are engaging PZ.Myers.

When you read Jonathan Wells you are engaging Rev.Sun Myung Moon.

A.K.A. the Messiah.

For Moon and Wells intelligent design is merely an expedient carrier wave for the Unification Church.

And IDiots responded:
Upright BiPed
November 4, 2011 at 10:15 am

How does any of this rambling denunciation change the physical evidence for design?

How does a rule emerge in a physical process, say like translation?
November 4, 2011 at 10:59 am

Upright BiPed:

“How does any of this rambling denunciation change the physical evidence for design?”

It doesn’t! You need to understand the strategy of deflection , burden shift and outright character assasination and it’s purpose when nothing of worth is to be found to prop up a failed evolutionist term such as “Junk-DNA”.

(And a lot more irrelevant, rambling, denunciating bullshit.)


Tell me, uptight and eo-obscene, how does any of the deflection and burden shifting, along with rambling denunciation and outright character assassination of "Darwinists", Darwin, Dawkins, Hawking, materialists, atheists, agnostics, theistic evolutionists, evolutionists, naturalists, free thinkers, many scientists, many journalists/bloggers/commenters/etc., that You IDiots CONSTANTLY engage in, change the fact that you IDiots have NO physical evidence for intelligent design in nature? Well?